In Charlestown it went from 21 poor kids to 7 poor kids getting in. However, without the exam only 7 socioeconomically disadvantaged kids in West Roxbury got into the schools, as opposed to 9 with the exam.
Those accepted students were just as qualified as the non-economically disadvantaged kids in West Roxbury and the Back Bay, showing that social mobility is possible in Boston, despite alleged systemic racism. In one Roxbury zip code 21 of 27 accepted students were poor (78%). In West Roxbury 9 of the 133 were poor (7%). “Eco dis” means “socioeconomically disadvantaged.” Last year the Back Bay had 27 kids invited, and none of them were poor (0%). All they had to do to fix the exam schools diversity problem was eliminate merit. Whereas areas that are disproportionately white like the Back Bay, Charlestown, Roslindale, and especially West Roxbury, saw drastic decreases in the number of accepted students. The new system had its desired effect – areas of Boston that are disproportionately black and brown like Roxbury, East Boston, Mattapan, and Dorchester, all saw huge increases in the number of accepted students. Coronavirus was their excuse to get rid of it, but they really have an issue with the fact that it contributes to a merit based system. White and Asian kids were doing too well on the test, therefore it had to go.
In a Marxist society everyone gets paid the same regardless of qualifications, and in racial Marxism everyone gets into the same schools, regardless of qualifications. CRT has substituted white and Asian people as the oppressors, and everyone else as the oppressed. Marxism is the belief that there are two classes of people – the oppressed and the oppressors. But critical race theory is really just racial Marxism.
0 kommentar(er)
